Author: cts125
You know I could give a rats ass about Rachel Ray. It’s actually pretty easy to just ignore her..she’s just the latest harmless media fad but…what’s up with you getting so riled up and then going the weight-issue/appearance way. I mean based on your recent ‘make-over’ (based on all the photos you post of your recent advertising appearance) is it not classic pot calling kettle. You have devolved into yet another modern media clone..gym-toned, thin, color-balanced bland ‘personality’. And to resort to fat name- calling jokes…that’s beyond lame and just demonstrates your own self-satisfied smugness.
Well you raise a lot of points here, cts125, some of them almost interesting.
Let me see if I can address them without dozing off.
“You know I could give a rats ass about Rachel Ray. It’s actually pretty easy to just ignore her..she’s just the latest harmless media fad”
Let me congratulate you for finding Rachael Ray “pretty easy to ignore”. Personally, I don’t have the nerve not to watch television or read a magazine or go online. It must be fun being Amish.
“what’s up with you getting so riled up and then going the weight-issue/appearance way.”
I firmly maintain that when you pose in your underwear and deep throat a spoon for FHM, you are, in fact, asking people to look at and notice your body. They aren’t going to suddenly stop looking when you gain weight or get old. That’s the thing about exposure. It exposes you.
I didn’t go rooting through her garbage. This is not a private citizen. She is in all media everyday, and there is a consequence to being public. Even I know that.
I also find it disingenuous that she talks so much about making healthy choices, and then goes on to pimp donuts, crackers, and sugary lattes full of corn syrup.
I’m not the first to notice that her weight has increased as she has formed these partnerships. More and more cheap and fattening products are added to her menus as these companies pay for the privilege. She peddles junk food to a nation that hardly needs it, while pretending to be an expert on eating well. I don’t like hypocrisy, and I tend to point it out when I see it.
Speaking of which…
“I mean based on your recent ‘make-over’ (based on all the photos you post of your recent advertising appearance) is it not classic pot calling kettle.”
Uhm, no. Maybe this will help.
53 responses so far ↓
1 nix // Nov 30, 2007 at 8:18 pm
Your troll-fu amazes me. We should all argue so intelligently.
2 Gina // Nov 30, 2007 at 8:26 pm
April, why do you hate fat people?
3 John Foley // Nov 30, 2007 at 8:34 pm
And the troops.
4 Gina // Nov 30, 2007 at 8:35 pm
Especially the fat troops.
5 JohnnyBoy // Nov 30, 2007 at 8:38 pm
Ok, this is going to be like arguing with the cat, but here goes:
If Rachael Ray was bald, then I’d call her a bald-headed fuck and claim she’s not really bald but that she really has lots of hair but it’s all INSIDE HER HEAD clogging up her brain and that’s why she’s stupid.
And I’d still love Telly Savalas and Mr. Clean cause they’re really nice guys
6 jim // Nov 30, 2007 at 9:00 pm
Nose out of joint?
Icing on the cake!
7 Auntie Vera Charles // Nov 30, 2007 at 9:01 pm
I smell fat fish.
8 JohnnyBoy // Nov 30, 2007 at 9:13 pm
Auntie vera Charles, I’d have thought you’d have said that by now
Either that or I smell Manta Ray
9 pal Jacky // Nov 30, 2007 at 9:51 pm
As some of you might remember, I went through a period of hating carlos mencia. Actually, it was more of a period of talking about my hatred for Carlos Mencia. I still hate him, He was on an episode of ‘Mad TV’ earlier this year and I haven’t watched it since. It got to a boiling point and out it came. Throwing EVOO into recipes along with whatever mundane name brands she’s currently getting paid by is just so fucking phoney. So she isn’t nearly as big a threat to theology and geometry as Dr.Laura. However, she is far worse than the Paris Hiltons and the Lindsey Lohans in this world because of the unsuspecting morons who actually believe she has something good to give to the world.
10 JohnnyBoy // Nov 30, 2007 at 10:02 pm
See, that’s the thing….I actually have some sympathy for Paris Hilton and Lindsay Lohan. Of course, iIf I never saw them again, it’d be wonderful, but I don’t feel any sort of seething hate
11 coasterboy // Nov 30, 2007 at 10:52 pm
Um, April, I don’t think you can really say that RR is deep throating the spoon. From the pic, I’d say she’s more of a “Can’t I just lick it - just around the edges?” girl.
12 John Foley // Nov 30, 2007 at 10:55 pm
Leave it to your fan base to make distinctions over correct fellatio terminology.
13 coasterboy // Nov 30, 2007 at 11:13 pm
Then again…..
I could easily see her swallowing twinkies whole, and demonstrating the proper technique of deep throating a frozen banana.
Whichever, RR certainly does seem to derive great pleasure from her oral endeavors.
14 speledwrong // Dec 1, 2007 at 12:03 am
April, you completely missed the point. She said you were thin. And also, Rachel Ray is blowing the spoon “harmonica style”
15 Shannon // Dec 1, 2007 at 12:41 am
RR looks like the kind of girl who says, “Alllllright, I’ll lick it once, just once.”
And she seems to like the chocolate, if you know what I mean…
Face it world, April is a hater, a little, tiny, skinny, pretty and smart hater.
She’s our Oprah.
16 Shannon // Dec 1, 2007 at 12:47 am
Let’s pick on cts123
“You know I could give a rats ass about Rachel Ray.”
Wouldn’t that be “rat’s ass.” I am sure it’s not plural.
17 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 1:05 am
Perhaps ‘rat’ is being used as a pronoun. Then it would be rats ass.
18 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 1:09 am
I don’t think I’d want my dick near Rachel Ray’s mouth. We’ve seen what she eats. BTW. I meant ‘rats ass’ of course.
19 Shannon // Dec 1, 2007 at 1:20 am
But your dick might taste better with a little EVOO.
Now that’s dicktastic!
20 gary // Dec 1, 2007 at 1:50 am
What the fuck is color balanced ?
Is that a Style Network thing?
21 JohnnyBoy // Dec 1, 2007 at 2:29 am
I know that “color balance” is a function of Fauxtoshop that controls the levels of Red, Green and Blue…so apparently April has these in the correct proportions
There is another control called “brightness” that cts125 needs to turn up higher
22 JohnnyBoy // Dec 1, 2007 at 2:39 am
or “color balanced” could mean that April equally hates Fat Black People
23 gary // Dec 1, 2007 at 10:06 am
I think it’s the latter
24 JohnnyBoy // Dec 1, 2007 at 11:31 am
Now there’s an important distinction here, she hates them equally, but it’s not as if she hates all fat people regardless of color. They are to be kept in their own individual category in order to maintain the separation of Church and Restaurant
What about Fat Black Troops?
25 April // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:13 pm
Let’s not start categorizing all the people I hate. We don’t have that kind of time.
26 EverybodysLittlePony // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:14 pm
Coming soon…
Teenage Mutant Fat Black Troops!
Sunday nights on Adult Swim
and…
cts125: Portrait of the Artist as a Whiny Little Douche
Thursday on Lifetime
27 JohnnyBoy // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:19 pm
The Major : I hate Germans……..love women
Polly: What about German women?
The Major: Excellent card players
Fawlty Towers
28 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:32 pm
I always say, I hate stupid people, but truth be known I really only hate anyone who wants people to think they are smarter than what they are. my favorite current hatred is for both sides of the psychic/skeptic debate. My derision for frauds like Uri Geller is dwarfed only by for the sloppy ’scientific’ methods of the amazing randi and Penn Gillette. I want to see a show called ‘mythbuster-busters’.
29 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:36 pm
If rachel ray claims to be healthy, she should be healthyThese guys claim to be scientific, they need to be scientific. Being a little more scientific than Sylvia Browne just makes them seem foolish.
30 Shannon // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:39 pm
pal Jacky is here!!!
31 JohnnyBoy // Dec 1, 2007 at 3:45 pm
palJacky, do you seriously have more contempt for those who seek to expose frauds than the hoodwinking charlatan?
My friend Mark is a close friend of both Randi and Penn Gillette, and while I do get annoyed at anyone who has the attitude of “if it can’t be proven then it isn’t possible”, I can’t see how you could classify Geller and Randi as two sides of the same evil
32 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 8:30 pm
No true scientist would have the attitude’ if it can’t be proven then it isn’t possible’. What is wrong is the leap of faith from ‘hasn’t to ‘can’t’ .What bugs me is their sloppy science coupled with their smug arrognace about the whole process. ‘Their attitude is more, if something can be faked, it has been faked”. believe science will get all the answers, but it may not have them now. Many of the real scientists have quit the skeptical societies because of these type of loudmouths(actually Randi was drummed out of the ‘big’ one because of his ignorance of the scientific method. ) Let’s face it calling someone a ‘loon’ because they saw lights in the sky isn’t becoming when ten years later the DOD admits to running a B-2 bomber test that same night. Just like no true scientist would call themselves an athiest(in Nietsche’s use of the term) because ‘absense of evidence is not evidence of absence’ . At most a real scientist will call themselves an athiest.
33 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 8:34 pm
when I see Penn on some show about Nostradamous saying things like ‘why was he so cryptic?’. I get sick. I don’t believe Nostro at all, but I at least know that during that time, if he wasn’t cryptic he couold have easily been put to death by the church. It just shows a total blowhard quality about this mindset that he is above even doing a little bit of research when it comes to dealing with obvious frauds.
34 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 8:35 pm
oops I meant a real scientist will call themselves ‘agnostic’.
35 pal Jacky // Dec 1, 2007 at 8:58 pm
it’s that hypocrisy thing. If someone claims to be doing something by the’scientific’ process they better damn well be doing it with some scientific rigor. Since their targets are mostly easily seen through frauds, It’s even abigger shame that they half ass the methods. How the hell did the amzing Randi get caught libling Uri Gellor anyhow. Read the case, it wasn’t a wayward jury, the asshole just didn’t give a shit enough to get his facts stright. repeating ‘Uri gellor is a shakedown artist over and over again is just pathetic. even though its an accurate statement.
36 JohnnyBoy // Dec 1, 2007 at 8:59 pm
palJacky, I certainly agree with your assessment……in fact, Mark is a diehard atheist, and I’ve always had a problem with that. If you don’t want to believe in a supreme being, fine, why not just say you’re an agnostic?
Arrogant blowhard, yeah, sums it up pretty well.
But attempting to expose frauds and charlatans , regardless of the methods used, says to me that their hearts are in the right place. Their heads might be up their asses, but that’s another matter.
I hold them in considerably higher regard than those who would prey on someone who has lost a loved one, or who claims to have supernatural powers when they really don’t
37 roxy contin // Dec 2, 2007 at 12:43 am
April, I have a confession to make. It pains me to do this publicly, because it’s a sensitive issue. But as I get older and wiser, I see the value of being unflinchingly honest about myself.
I’m not very smart.
No, let me finish.
I realize my screen name might give you the impression that I’m clever, but the truth is, there 37,000 Roxy Contins out there. Sure, most them are still wearing neon hair extensions and going to raves, but they’re still more interesting than I am.
So I want to thank you for changing this post for me, because what I had originally written here was so humiliatingly stupid that it shamed me just to look at it. And thank you for changing my password, so I can’t change it back when I’m drunk.
Very truly yours,
Roxy Contin
(suppressedmadness@hotmail.com)
38 JohnnyBoy // Dec 2, 2007 at 2:49 am
Wench-el ?
April’s Kryptonian?
COOL !
39 pal Jacky // Dec 2, 2007 at 6:38 am
my main problem still goes back to the science. For instance, I saw film of a faith healer pulling organs out of person. Then the randi demonstraited on how it could have been done. Then he flat out. said ‘this is how the guy did it’. No, it is how the guy could have done it. Rigorous science requires evidence that the sham actually used that method. This sounds petty to people without a science background, but it leads to the dismissal of every photo and witness as ‘obvious fakes’ without even giving them the once over twice. furthermore, many of their best arguments are like that ones people used in 1900 to prove people would never fly. “if people could fly why haven’t we seen it” . When the top physicists of today are yapping about sci fi stull like wormholes closed minded assholes just seem irrelevant.
40 pal Jacky // Dec 2, 2007 at 7:02 am
since I’ve already bored everyone else, I might as add one last incident. There was an Italian man who thought there might be a correlation between size and heartyness of a person and their astrological sign. He gathered data and it fit his theory. It was big press Well the pseudo-skeptics(as I call them) had a field day trashing him, bitching about his data collection. Finally, a medical doctor pointed out that it is well known that average body size is related to the seasons which a person is gestated ( spring babies are smaller than fall babies or the other way around). These debunkers were too busy going down the wrong path just to belittle this italian for his belief in astrology, instead of looking another more rational reason for his data to fit.
41 JohnnyBoy // Dec 2, 2007 at 9:46 am
I fully agree that they’re being closed-minded assholes. No argument there at all.
But a person pretending to cure someone by using sleight-of-hand to pull chicken gizzards out of them, and putting their life in danger because they believe they’re cured, is an EVIL PERSON
The naysayers are just a bunch of boorish know-it-all smugbuggys.
I was merely trying to point out the difference, that’s all.
42 pal Jacky // Dec 2, 2007 at 2:58 pm
point well taken. The science is on the skeptics side. I just wish they would utilize it, instead of just claiming to utilize it . Quoting carl Sagen over and over just doesn’t cut it . One of the skepics heroes is houdini. He debunked(actually,not just randi like) many frauds in his day. However, one thing Randi and Gillette’ forget’ to mention is the secret code that he worked out with his wife that he would say to her after his death so she knew he was really visiting her. It is possible to be skeptical and open minded. Their closemindedness is what makes them assholes.
43 coasterboy // Dec 2, 2007 at 3:50 pm
zzzzzzzzzzzzzzz…..
44 pal Jacky // Dec 2, 2007 at 6:22 pm
now that coaster boy is asleep, the discussion can start in earnest. Why bother? The main problem is the whole concept of the scientific method is cheapened. Take the global warming debate. Both sides have some points yet neither really know what to do with them. The science seems to show these days, that it is a natural earth/sun process and has happened before 12000 years ago, So the one side claims its not manmade so we don’t have to run our cars on rotting corn, and Al gore is an asshole. They miss the point, that if if really is nature, then we really have to worry about it before we are all burned or drowned.
45 Shannon // Dec 2, 2007 at 8:27 pm
Please, everyone just stop for a moment and think of how many gallons of gas you use every year times the number of vehicles on the road. Then take the number of gallons you get out of an acre of corn and start cypherin’
There isn’t enough useable acreage on the face of the earth to support all the vehicles. Let alone all the resources it would take to amend the soil and grow corn year after year in the same soil.
It’s snake oil folks. Its a machine that turns salt water into gold. And in the meantime, the powers that be have already set into motion they way they are going to get our money. Much like Enron.
The sky is falling.
46 JohnnyBoy // Dec 2, 2007 at 9:01 pm
There also wasn’t enough of whatever they used to make buggy whips out of, dire predictions about what would happen, then the car appeared
things have a way of sorting themselves out
47 jim // Dec 2, 2007 at 9:02 pm
Corn? Hemp? Rutabagas? Shannon’s right, biofuels are the energy industy’s Laetrile. Results? Apparently those are for pussies now.
That man-or-nature debate on global warming is a very parlous red herring … it’s not as if we don’t have a lot of experience with how much extreme weather can screw our pooch, or how fast. I think skepticism & open-mindedness are in conflict - & that’s a very good dynamic if you can hold on to it. Each does in fact strengthen the other. If you can keep them from rending one another to bits, that is.
48 pal Jacky // Dec 3, 2007 at 4:23 pm
I through in global warming to show that bad science can have some major consequences, not just showing that Sylvia Browne should be gassed. yes gas is running out, blah ,blah blah. It seems to me that this is due to overpopulation and a reliance on oil. C’mon, we can get performances of everything Mozart and Beethoven ever composed into the same little tiny little I-pod with enough space left over to throw in a wagner or a mahler, but we can’t rid ourselves of fossil fues. Jim I agree with you if you are using ’skeptic’ in the new fangled randi sense. The traditional use is really ‘let’s not take something at face value’ and that is open-mindedness. In short, I don’t want semantic nonsense to make it sound like we oppose each other. I’ve always considered myself a skeptic and yet, I don’t want to be lumped into the same class as these turds, and they’ve sort of taken over the term to mean something it really isn’t(or wasn’t) .
49 pal Jacky // Dec 3, 2007 at 6:08 pm
the idea ‘contempt before investigation’ has been the bane of science since the earliest days. Perhaps Galieio and Bruno got the worst of it. People of Randi and penn’s ilk thrive on it and turn around and call it good science. Science is would be better off without these people who treat it like a religion.
50 pal Jacky // Dec 3, 2007 at 6:32 pm
I love beating a dead horse. I also love deluded people. The quack faith healers and ‘gimmi money to see your dead wife’ people aside., there are some real corkers in the field. I love ‘coast to coast’ am so I can hear insanity in action. I should mention my favorite ‘jack the ripper’ suspect is Lewis Carroll. Not because any evidence at all points in his direction, but supersized mega nut job Richard wallace wrote two laugh out loud books on the subject. That much more so since this corker is deadly serious. He went so far and had some of carroll’s (dodgsen’s) handwriting samples compared to the ripper notes. Undaunted by the negative results, he started to go through LC’s friends to figure exactly who could have been his accomplice and written the notes for him. Much better than listening to actual ripperologists yapping about their pet Jack.(BTW ‘pal Jacky’ is taken from a ripper note).
51 JohnnyBoy // Dec 3, 2007 at 8:24 pm
and I always thought it was a Pal Joey reference
52 pal Jacky // Dec 3, 2007 at 11:31 pm
http://www.casebook.org/ripper_letters/index.html?printer=true
it is from the ‘dear boss’ letter. short for your pal Jacky, so lowercase ‘p’
53 pal Jacky // Dec 3, 2007 at 11:34 pm
actually, the second ‘dear boss’ letter, the one some think is a hoax. i
You must log in to post a comment.